Some Tips for Online Student Projects
Several issues arise with web-based projects that are not
usually found with more traditional projects such as research papers: 1)
students’ (incorrect) feeling of anonymity, which leads them to say things they
might not say in a paper or in person; 2) the public nature of the web means
that sometimes work can be taken out of context by those it wasn’t intended
for; and 3) issues of student’s privacy, since their academic work is protected
by the Family Education Privacy Rights Act (FERPA).
- When presenting a web-based project assignment, discuss
the implications with your students. Remind them that it is still a class
project and should be approached with the same thoughtfulness and discretion as
any other work for the class. For some students, it is difficult to balance
free expression with campus values of civility and tolerance. Below we offer
some sample guidelines of the kind you should hand out to your students, and
discuss with them.
- When considering a web-based assignment, you should
probably assume that somehow, someone who isn’t the intended audience will see it. (The equivalent of the email rule that you shouldn’t send it if you
wouldn’t be comfortable with its being forwarded around.) Since the context of
an assignment may not be visible online, the results of an assignment can leave
you, the student, and the campus open to a variety of unwarranted criticisms,
and in extreme cases, legal action. Therefore, if you are asking students to deal with sensitive issues,
e.g., issues of identity, such as race, gender, religion, you might ask
yourself whether an online presentation is the best way to approach the
subject. If you conclude that it
is, you might want to modify the assignment to remove personal responses.
Remember, anything posted on the open web is likely to be indexed and archived.
This means that this content could live on in perpetuity. They should put up
nothing they would regret when running for President 20 years later.
- Protect your students’ right to privacy.
First and foremost, unless it is pertinent to the intended
learning goals, assignments should be posted in web spaces that require
authentication (bSpace). Avoid using open web services, such as blogspot.com or
Google groups, that are outside the Berkeley domain. If students choose, on
their own, to also post their work in a public space (their own web
pages, myspace, etc), that is left to their
individual choice but should not be a requirement of the course.
If the instructors believe that the assignment cannot meet
their educational goals if assignments are not posted publicly, then students
should sign a written waiver agreeing to this. However, in all probability,
students can refuse to sign such a waiver without penalty.
In addition, students (or student groups for joint projects)
should sign some sort of agreement at the beginning of
class about the public nature of their work (for example, that assignments will
be available for all class members to see within bSpace),
and this agreement should be specific about behavior and keeping the web-based
environment as civil and as safe as we would expect in a physical classroom.
The general expectation is that t work is shared only between the student and
the instructor.
For more details on student privacy policies, see
“Disclosure of Information from Student Records” [pdf]
Sample Guidelines for
Your Students
Being
a responsible citizen in a digital world
- While I
strongly respect, support, and encourage your right to free expression of your
ideas, I expect you to respect me, your fellow students, and
others who might see your project. By publishing on the web, you not
only represent yourself, but this course and the university.
- The
projects should abide not only by the UC Berkeley Principles of Community, but
campus policies governing computer use (see attached), and student conduct.
- Just as
they are not acceptable in class, hostility, rudeness, and disrespectfulness
will not be tolerated in your projects.
- Please remember that this project is part of a course of
instruction, not an independent work published independently; therefore, it
must follow the guidelines laid out.
- If you are unsure whether an approach you are taking
violates any of these guidelines, please check with me before finishing the
project.
- If I consider any part of your
project to be in violation of university principles or guidelines, I will
discuss the issue with you. If we
cannot come to an agreement, I reserve the right, as the instructor, to remove the
project from the page.
Helpful background material for instructors wishing to
create their own guidelines:
Principles of Community
These principles of community for the University of California, Berkeley,
are rooted in our mission of teaching, research and public service. They
reflect our passion for critical inquiry, debate, discovery and innovation, and
our deep commitment to contributing to a better world. Every member of the UC
Berkeley community has a role in sustaining a safe, caring and humane
environment in which these values can thrive.
- We place honesty and integrity in our teaching,
learning, research and administration at the highest level.
- We recognize the intrinsic relationship between
diversity and excellence in all our endeavors.
- We affirm the dignity of all individuals and strive
to uphold a just community in which discrimination and hate are not tolerated.
- We are committed to ensuring freedom of expression
and dialogue that elicits the full
spectrum of views held by our varied
communities.
- We respect the differences as well as the
commonalities that bring us together and call for civility and respect in our
personal interactions.
- We believe that active participation and leadership
in addressing the most pressing issues facing our local and global communities
are central to our educational mission.
- We embrace open and equitable access to
opportunities for learning and development as our obligation and goal.
(UC Berkeley's "Principles of
Community" statement was developed collaboratively by students, faculty,
staff, and alumni, and issued by the Chancellor. Its intent is to serve as an
affirmation of the intrinsic and unique value of each member of the UC Berkeley
community and as a guide for our personal and collective behavior, both on
campus and as we serve society.)
Computer Use Policy
Examples of Misuse
- Using electronic mail to harass others.
- Posting materials on electronic bulletin boards that violate existing
laws or the University's codes of conduct.
Appropriate
Use
UC Berkeley
extends to students, faculty, and staff the privilege to use its computers and
network. When you are provided access to our campus network, you are enabled to
send and receive electronic mail messages around the world, share in the
exchange of ideas through electronic news groups, and use Web browsers and
other Internet tools to search and find needed information.
The Internet is a very large set of connected computers, whose users
make up a worldwide community. In addition to formal policies, regulations, and laws which govern your use of computers and networks,
the Internet user community observes informal standards of conduct. These
standards are based on common understandings of appropriate, considerate behavior which evolved in the early days of the Internet,
when it was used mainly by an academic and highly technical community. The
Internet now has a much wider variety of users, but the early codes of conduct
persist, crossing boundaries of geography and government, in order to make
using the Internet a positive, productive, experience. You are expected to
comply with these informal standards and be a "good citizen" of the
Internet.
Campus Online Activities Policy
Technology service providers must take a broad view of their privacy
and confidentiality responsibilities, such as minimizing invasion into private
lives and avoiding risks to health and safety. For example, the online
publisher of a class roster who wishes to include student pictures and contact
information must get permission from each student, and also must limit access
to class members only, using password protection or other technologies.
Student Conduct Polic–102.11 Harassment
Harassment by a
student of any person. For the purposes of these policies, ‘harassment’: (a) is the use, display, or
other demonstration of words, gestures, imagery, or physical materials, or the
engagement in any form of bodily conduct, on the basis of race, color, national
or ethnic origin, alienage, sex, religion, age,
sexual orientation, or physical or mental disability, that has the effect of
creating a hostile and intimidating environment sufficiently severe or
pervasive to substantially impair a reasonable person’s participation in University
programs or activities, or use of University facilities; (b) must target a
specific person or persons; and (c) must be addressed directly to that person
or persons.
Statement from the Syllabus of Anthropology
136i Summer 2006, Ruth Tringham
We meet as a
class for a number of reasons:
- To discuss the material, share insights that each of us may
have had while working through the
materials. Doing so enables us to learn more (or better) than we might as independent scholars. In discussion, we also have the opportunity to discover our misconceptions by
expressing ourselves and listening carefully to others.
- To present our research to one another. By presenting the
fruits of our individual labors we take a stand
for what we believe to be true and put our own work in the light for review by our
peers. This is perhaps the most important aspect of method in computer science, or in
any discipline for that matter.
- To review the work of others. We learn not only by exploring
material through independent scholarship, but also by seeing others' approaches and solutions to similar problems.
- To develop our abilities to express our thoughts in
real-time. It is one thing to be able to figure things
out, and another to have the thoughts fully developed and ready for action. How well do
we know the material if we can't engage in significant discussion and inquiry?