What is formative assessment of teaching?
How do you know if your teaching is effective? How can you identify areas where your teaching can improve? What does it look like to assess teaching?
Formative Assessment
Formative assessment of teaching consists of different approaches to continuously evaluate your teaching. The insight gained from this assessment can support revising your teaching strategies, leading to better outcomes in student learning and experiences. Formative assessment can be contrasted with summative assessment, which is usually part of an evaluative decision-making process. The table below outlines some of the key differences between formative and summative assessment:
Evaluation of Teaching | ||
---|---|---|
Type of Assessment |
Formative |
Summative |
Description |
Gather evidence of teaching to guide the instructor towards growth and improvement. |
Gather evidence of teaching to make a decision about the instructor being evaluated. |
Purpose |
To reveal the instructor’s current strengths and areas for improvement. |
To judge the instructor’s case for promotion, tenure, or other decision of consequence. |
Analogy |
A check-in that allows you to adjust and correct your actions. |
A final exam in a course where your performance is judged. |
Relationship |
May generate pieces of evidence over time that can later be used as part of a summative assessment. |
May use approaches similar to formative assessment with a different purpose and audience. |
By participating in formative assessment, instructors connect with recent developments in the space of teaching and learning, as well as incorporate new ideas into their practice. Developments may include changes in the students we serve, changes in our understanding of effective teaching, and changes in expectations of the discipline and of higher education as a whole.
Formative assessment of teaching ultimately should guide instructors towards using more effective teaching practices. What does effectiveness mean in terms of teaching?
Effectiveness in Teaching
Effective teaching can be defined as teaching that leads to the intended outcomes in student learning and experiences. In this sense, there is no single perfect teaching approach. Effective teaching looks will depend on the stated goals for student learning and experiences. A course that aims to build student confidence in statistical analysis and a course that aims to develop student writing could use very different teaching strategies, and still both be effective at accomplishing their respective goals.
Assessing student learning and experiences is critical to determining if teaching is truly effective in its context. This assessment can be quite complex, but it is doable. In addition to measuring the impacts of your teaching, you may also consider evaluating your teaching as it aligns with best practices for evidence-based teaching especially in the disciplinary and course context or aligns with your intended teaching approach. The table below outlines these three approaches to assessing the effectiveness of your teaching:
Evidence of Effective Teaching | |||
---|---|---|---|
Approach |
Student Learning Experiences |
Alignment with Best Practices |
Alignment with Intention |
Question |
Does my current course design or teaching strategy lead to students able to demonstrate my stated learning outcomes? |
Does my current course design or teaching strategy align with what is recommended in my context (e.g. student level, class format/size, discipline)? |
Does my current course design or teaching strategy align with my teaching philosophy and values? |
Rationale |
Measures of student learning are the most authentic and accurate metrics for teaching efficacy. Effective teaching will increase student learning from before to after a course, and to a higher extent compared to less effective methods. |
Research has identified several strategies more likely to be effective at accomplishing certain student outcomes. Certain instructional formats/approaches may help accomplish particular skill learning objectives. |
The planned teaching approach may not actually be reflected in practice. Observations and student experiences can reveal a mismatch between reality and intentions. |
Methods |
Direct evaluation of student work through papers, projects, assignments, exam questions Student surveys for intended experiences or changes in student beliefs/attitudes |
Evaluation of course design components using instructor rubrics Evaluation of live teaching practice using classroom observation protocols |
Student surveys for perceptions of class environment or instructor practice Evaluation of live teaching practice using classroom observation protocols |